Fumbling Statistics and Patriot Trends

There has been a lot of discussion and (misinformation) floating around on fumbling. Because fumbling is not exactly a sexy topic, it’s not something that gets a lot of love, perhaps outside of Bill Barnwell’s research on the randomness of fumble recoveries. The purpose of this post is to clarify general fumbling trends, behaviors and how the New England Patriots fit into this puzzle.

For this research, I’m using PFR’s database. I’ll try and highlight wherever possible any gaps in the data.

I. 2007-2014 Totals

Since 2007, the Patriots have the lowest fumbling rate in the NFL. There are a lot of reasons for this — as in, the individual areas in which they excel — and many possible explanations for those reasons (e.g. “they are better coached”). We’ll explore some of these in a moment. First, here are the league-wide fumbling rates from 2007-2014, using both special teams and offensive plays:


The Patriots fumble the least frequently over this time period. Their claim to the top spot is a difference of 3 total fumbles in 7 years over the second-place Atlanta Falcons. Some other observations:

Dome Teams vs. Outdoor Teams (based on home stadium)
Dome team fumble% = 1.83
Outdoor teams fumble% = 1.94%

The sample size is small (9 dome teams), but there is very little, at least on the surface, to suggest playing in a dome reduces fumbling rates. At least not by anything we can detect with these sample sizes and the data parsed this way. There should be no one viewing teams that play outdoor home games as a different set of fumblers than teams playing indoor games at home.

So, how does fumbling break down under a more granular microscope? Do some teams fumble more or less in the special teams than in the run or pass game? (Teams use different, shared “K-Balls” more geared toward kicking on special teams plays). How do QB’s fit in? Pass protection? The following sections take a deeper look.

II. Special Teams vs. Offensive Plays

The league average fumbling rate on special teams and on rushing/passing plays is starkly different. If general common sense weren’t enough evidence, this is overwhelming support that fumbling is not random. This makes sense, as impact/effort/vulnerability and ball security all contribute to a fumble. The plays on special teams are often more violent and more hectic. Here’s the difference:

2007-2014 NFL Averages
Special Team plays fumble%: 2.81%
Offensive plays fumble%: 1.77%

And a breakdown of Special Teams fumbling rates by team since 2007:


III. The Patriots on Offensive Plays Alone

The Patriots have a larger edge over the field when looking at just offensive plays since 2007. This is the impetus for the statistical “analysis” angle that they have been playing with advantageous balls. Allow me to make one comment outside of statistics for a second: High School and collegiate athletes take steroids. Not all make the NFL. The bad can cheat to be average and the great can cheat to be legendary. Thus, nothing can prove a team didn’t cheat. However, we can “prove” that something is either a reasonable outlier or not really an outlier at all, which is where this next figure fits in.


Here New England is well ahead of the league. Second-place Atlanta would have needed 18 additional fumbles in 7 years (is that a lot?) to pull even with the Patriots. Speaking of Atlanta, while New England’s z-score of 2.70 — assuming a normal distribution of fumbling exists — is impressive, but it’s not some anomaly. Atlanta boasts a better z-score over the same time period on special teams, as shown in section II. Statistically, this means that it’s very likely something is causing Atlanta and New England to excel in these areas other than just randomness. Until 2 weeks ago, that something was universally explained by

  • coaching
  • ball security of individual players
  • scheme
  • opponent
  • game situation

and so on…in other words, fumbling isn’t random because there are areas where teams and individuals can excel that allow them to fumble less frequently than others.

IV. Quarterbacks fumble the most

Speaking of quarterbacks, they fumble the most. Since 2007, PFR has 4,822 fumbles on record coming from skilled position players on offense — the QB’s, RB’s, WR’s and TE’s. Of those fumbles, nearly half belong to quarterbacks, a not-so-shocking revelation when we consider all the additional variables in play for a QB fumbling other than simply “running with football.” Quarterbacks have a center-exchange of the ball, a handoff exchange, and most importantly, are smashed by much larger men, often when they are trying to do something other than “run” and might have no idea that they are going to be smashed. (“The strip sack.”)


So the QB fumbling performance of a team will have a sizable impact on the overall offense’s fumbling rate. This means that if a team is equipped with a QB with excellent ball-handling, who makes quick decisions and avoids pressure in the pocket well, he (and the scheme and offensive line, technically), can single-handedly inflate or deflate a team’s fumbling rate. Here are the top fumbling teams by QB since 2007 (Plays include passing attempts, rushing attempts and sacks):


The Quarterbacks of those top teams are some of the least-frequent fumblers in the league. Here are the top QB’s, minimum 500 passing attempts, since 2007. Note, fumble% for QB’s includes their passing attempts, so the number of “plays” involved are passing attempts, sacks and rushes. (min 500 attempts)


While Tom Brady excels here, he isn’t even on the top line. Peyton Manning, with his incredibly low 0.70% fumble rate clocks in at the top (along with former Brady backup Brian Hoyer), which makes for an interesting case study, because Manning switched teams a few years ago. Here are how Manning’s teams fared over the years with and without him.


The 2005 and 2006 numbers are best in the league, posting z-scores of 2.10 and 2.14. Manning is barely clipped by Brady’s Patriots in 2007 (1.18% to 1.13%) only to regain the top spot in 2008 at 0.83%. Only six teams from 2003-2010 posted fumble rates under 1%, and Manning’s Colts did it four times, in addition to a 1.01% season in 2010. Manning left and the 2011 Colts offensive fumble rate plummeted to second-worst in the league. Meanwhile, he joined a Broncos team with the worst 2011 fumble rate (2.56%) on offensive plays and in 2012, helped improve them to 1.28%, good for 10th in the league. The Colts 5-year run from 05-09 was the best of any team since 2003 at 0.98% fumble% over 5 years, narrowly edging the 2010-2014 Patriots at 0.99%.

V. The League Has Improved Ball Security

Everyone has improved their fumble% over the last decade. From 2008-2013 the league-wide fumble% declined every season, before blipping back up in 2014.


Notice that the best fumble season on offense in this period was the incredible 2011 New Orleans Saints season, just 0.54%. The Saints had another banner year in 2013 with a 0.74% rate. While 2003-2010 saw only 6 sub-1% fumble rate seasons from offenses, 2011-2014 produced 12. Three of those 12 were from the Patriots, who added a 0.74% of their own in 2011.

VI. How did the Patriots do It? A Law Firm?

The Patriots not only have excelled with Brady protecting the ball, but in their running game as well. Anecdotally, here is where Bill Belichick has always prioritized ball control, quick to bench talented runners who don’t take care of the ball. The Patriots finished with the best fumble rate at RB from 2007-2014, as shown below:


Benjarvus-Green Ellis never fumbled in 536 offensive touches in New England. If those 511 touches were replaced by running back who fumbled at a league average rate (1.07% for RB’s), the Patriots would have added about six fumbles to their total over this time period. While that may sound like a small amount, New England running backs fumbled a total of 26 times from 2007-2014; five additional fumbles is a 23% increase in total fumbles, and takes the Patriots from 1st in this category down to 11th. (0.92%) In other words, one could say the difference between Green-Ellis and an average ball-handling back is the difference between the Patriots finishing 11th and 1st in this category.

Patriots wide-receivers have not been as stellar over the same period.


They are 12th, slightly above the league average of 2.05%, but don’t stand out here in the way that the RB’s or QB does.

Of course, the other key to the Patriots excelling in these areas is their consistency. They don’t have a number of outlying individual seasons, but instead are very good every year. Focusing on where they really excel — fumbles per offensive play — you can see based on their yearly ranking how their consistency helps them gain a lead over the league in this selected time period (a time period where they have gone 100-28 as a team, grabbed 6 first-round byes and are playing in their 3rd Super Bowl.

Patriots Offensive Rank, fumble% by year
2007: 1st
2008: 4th
2009: 8th
2010: 1st
2011: 2nd
2012: 5th
2013: 19th
2014: 2nd

2013 saw the departure of a number of skilled position player, and included Stevan Ridley coughing up 4 fumbles in 188 touches, for a fumbling rate nearly double the league average at RB of 2.12%. LeGarrete Blount joined the team and fumbled 3 times in 158 touches (1.90%). That’s all it takes in the NFL to have a bad fumbling season.

VII. Fumbling Rates correlate and good offenses

Finally, as you may have noticed, some really good offenses protect the ball. Negatively correlated to fumble% — all around roughly 0.4 correlation coefficients — are the following offensive categories:

Yards (0.37)
1st-Down% (0.39)
TD’s (0.41)

In other words, better offensive teams tend to fumble the ball less. This isn’t universally true — thus the moderate coefficient of 0.4 — as teams with scrambling quarterbacks or teams with relatively bad pass protection might completely buck the trend, just as conservative offensives can do so in the opposite direction. But in general, good offenses, and especially QB’s that are good with the ball, will lead to less fumbling and increased offensive efficacy.

5 thoughts on “Fumbling Statistics and Patriot Trends

  1. Pingback: Quora
  2. Questions/Observations:

    1) You said QB’s fumble more often, which is true. But QB’s appear to fumble with less frequency than WR/TE/RB. A QB touches the ball on every play, plus there are many plays where he is the only player to touch the ball (sacks, QB runs, incomplete passes). That means that QB’s would represent well over 50% of all fumbles, if they fumbled at the same rate as WR/TE/RB.

    2) You note that Green-Ellis did not fumble. Instead of replacing his touches with “league average”, what happens if you replace his touches with “average non Green-Ellis Patriots RB”?

    3) As I’ve been reading about fumble rates in the past few months, I have learned that when dealing with small percentages like this, it can be more informative to use “plays per fumble” instead of “fumble percentage”. It’s hard to comprehend how a 0.75% fumble rate compares to a 0.90% fumble rate. But .75% converts to 133 plays per fumble, and .90% converts to 111 plays per fumble. So the difference between the best RB fumbling team and the 9th-best represents an extra fumble per 22 carries, which is nearly a whole game’s worth of carries.

    • 1) You are correct — this is a technicality. It’s not a QB “touch” when he hands it off, despite their being a QB-center exchange. Still, as you can see from the pie graph, QB’s are largely responsible for an offense’s overall fumble rate.

      2) 0.89%

      3) Sure, it’s the same thing, but don’t get confused with the math the way Warren Sharp did.

      To wit: Patriot RB’s fumbled every 133 touches in this period. The average NFL RB fumbled every 94 touches. At an average of 412 touches per season, the Patriots RB’s were 1.3 fumbles better than average PER SEASON. Without BGE, per your question, they fumbled every ~113 touches. About 0.7 fumbles per year better than league average.

      That someone managed to convince the masses that the Patriots had some freakish fumbling performance since 2007 is a seriously bad testament to high school math programs.

  3. And since I just re-read Sharp’s post, it seems he tried to take the 2010-2014 Patriots period as evidence of some incredible outlier….only they aren’t. As I mentioned above, they do not even hold the best 5-year period of the last decade, let alone over 25 years

    Using correct data (offensive plays), the 2010-2014 Patriots fumbled 0.99% of the time on offense. The Colts, from 05-09, 0.98%. Only the Colts played in a league where fumbling was more common. League Average was a fumble every 51 offensive plays from 05-09, and the Colts fumbled every 102 plays. From 10-14, the Patriots fumbled every 101 plays where the league averaged every 60 plays. Let’s just use z-scores to demonstrate the top outliers from 2007-2014 based on 5-year rolling averages:

    2007 IND 2.83
    2008 IND 3.83
    2009 IND 4.41
    2010 IND 4.14
    2011 NWE 3.84
    2012 NWE 3.66
    2013 NEW 2.99
    2014 NWE 3.53

    Sharp completely skews the data by using Special Teams fumbles as well. He presents a graph here about “best 5-year averages” http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/2015/the-new-england-patriots-prevention-of-fumbles-is-nearly-impossible

    I don’t need to go back 25 years. I can go back through just the last 12, and *on offense*, here are the top 5-year periods based on offensive play/fumble:
    1. 05-9 IND 102
    2. 06-10 IND 101
    3. 10-14 NWE 101
    4. 08-12 NWE 99
    5. 07-11 NWE 96
    6. 09-13 NWE 93
    7. 04-08 IND 86
    8. 09-13 ATL 85
    9. 10-14 NOR 85
    10. 08-12 ATL 85

    Notice how teams cluster together…as we’d expect using a 5-year rolling average. 80% of the data points are the same. Despite there being evidence that dome teams fumble less, the first outdoor team is Baltimore (10-14) and Green Bay (09-13) at 77 and 76 players/fumble, respectively. That 25 fumbles may sound like a large amount, but again it’s about 3 fumbles per year, or an extra fumble every 5.3 games. If we look at the worst fumbling teams ever, we see:

    256. 04-08 SFO 35 plays/fumble
    255. 06-10 OAK 36
    254. 05-09 OAK 37
    253. 04-08 OAK 38
    252. 05-09 SFO 38
    251. 06-10 ARI 39
    250. 03-07 SFO 39
    249. 03-07 OAK 40
    248. 07-11 ARI 40
    247. 03-07 ARI 41

    Is there something in the water in the Bay Area? Are road teams systematically cheating when they land in Northern California? Were the Raiders and 49ers TANKING to get the first pick?! Wait, Arizona is a dome team — what one Earth is going on here?

    What’s going on is when you look at 5-year averages obviously you’re going to see overlap and clusters. And since the other top teams at the time happened to be the historic Colts and historic Saints offenses (alongside the historic Patriot offenses), those 3 teams hold on the top spots. Dome-ness has nothing to do with it. FTR, the Falcons and Colts fumble *more* at home with Indy having an almost identical fumble rate during home and road performances. Sharp doesn’t want to mention that though.

    If we just looked at single seasons since 2003, the top fumbling rates are:
    1. 2011 NOR 186 fumbles/play
    2. 2010 NWE 164
    3. 2013 CAR 142
    4. 2011 NWE 135
    5. 2013 NOR 135
    6. 2008 IND 121
    7. 2012 HOU 121
    8. 2012 ATL 113
    9. 2003 KAN 111
    10. 2014 MIN 109

    Teams average about 1,000 offensive plays a season, so it’s easy to see that the difference between the teams in absolute terms. The 2011 Saints offense had 6 fumbles. The 2010 Vikings had 9.

    • Sharp also is stuck on the idea that Patriots had some impossible change in 2007. That’s simply not true either.

      Here are the top fumbling changes by season since 2003, by percentage increase in plays per fumble:

      1. 2011 Saints +213%
      2. 2013 Panthers +130%
      3. 2009 49ers +130%
      4. 2013 Panters +130%
      5. 2010 Patriots +129%
      6. 2009 Bills +122%
      7. 2013 Chargers +115%
      8. 2012 Texans +108%
      9. 2011 Panthers +108%
      10. 2006 Jets +107%

      And the top 4-year changes since 2003:

      1. 06-09 Saints to 10-13 Saints +89%
      2. 05-08 Packers to 09-13 Packers +78%
      3. 03-06 Patriots to 07-10 Patriots +75%
      4. 05-08 49ers to 09-12 49ers +71%
      5. 04-07 Patriots to 08-11 Patriots +68%
      6. 05-08 Texans to 09-12 Texans +66%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *